JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 19, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Álvaro Ovidio Ramos García Vs. Instituto De Seguros Sociales

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Segundo De Menores De Manizales Y El Juzgado Segundo De Familiar De Neiva. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Primer Juzgado Con El Fin De Que Tramite Y Decida La Acción De Tutela En Cuestión
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Juzgado de Menores
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia a prevención y libertad para escoger la especialidad del juez competente
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REMITIR, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. de Menores de Manizales, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Alvaro Ovidio Ramos Garcia contra el Instituto de Seguros Sociales.
  3. Segundo. COMUNICAR, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. de Familia de Neiva, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.